🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like it requires a PhD in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently the government is shut down due to political disagreements over subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with supporting medical services. When including these expenses compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like many our government's military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a better and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.